🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous race for the White House, the former president courted voters with promises to reduce prices starting on day one. But, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay precious little focus to the cost of living. All that changed after inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Within days, his team initiated a hastily assembled campaign to address affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours post-election, Trump kicked off his cost-reduction push with a disastrous remark: “Our groceries are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from the wealthy leader—who frequently mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for millions of Americans who struggle when visiting supermarkets. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about price levels.

His assertion about declining prices was highly misleading and dishonest. In what way could all costs be falling when his cherished tariffs were pushing up costs? Official statistics show banana prices increased nearly 7% over the past year, the price of beef went up 14.7%, and coffee prices jumped 18.9%—partly because of import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, prices rose in five of the six main grocery groups monitored by the Consumer Price Index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Statements

Despite the evidence, the president persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements contradict the reality that general costs have clearly increased since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is at a 3 percent per year, that’s half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, Trump boasted that gas prices had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data indicate they average over three dollars.

Faced with actual conditions and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” rhetoric made him sound dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many citizens are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of decreases. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Suggested Solutions and Their Potential Impact

As certain taxes reduced on several food items, the administration will probably claim that he has lowered costs once these products begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for putting out a fire that he had started. In another instance, when addressing McDonald’s executives, he declared that “we are in the peak period of America” and assured listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans facing hardships—particularly when millions risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, three-quarters of respondents believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while only 26% consider them positive. Another poll found that a majority of citizens feel the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Measures

The treasury secretary, Trump’s chief financial officer, lately disputed claims of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, certain sectors of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and lost approximately 33,000 jobs this year. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could help affordability.

In response to public dismay about affordability, the president proposed a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about huge budget deficits—will enact the proposal. The scheme would likely raise government expenditure, push up interest rates, and potentially fuel inflation by putting more money into the economy.

Another supposed fix for affordability centered on introducing half-century home loans, based on the idea that they could lower housing costs. However, reality is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to lower monthly payments—often reducing them by just $100 or $200 each month. The downside is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest borrowers pay and slow building home value.

Blaming the Previous Administration and Economic Prospects

In their cost-cutting effort, the administration have again pointed fingers at the previous president for economic problems, such as increasing costs. Officials claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are absurd and inaccurate allegations. In reality, the former president handed over a strong economy, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. However, the current administration’s actions—especially his tariffs—have resulted in an economic mess, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their conditions worsened by the administration’s trade policies. He fears that if key regions like California and New York enter a downturn, the US could face a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign probably ineffective to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.